The attacks launched by Hamas on 7 October 2023 were horrifying. Yet what followed, unleashed in the name of retaliation, revealed something even more chilling: the wholesale abandonment of moral constraint by a state that has long claimed the mantle of Western democratic virtue. In the weeks and months since, the Israeli government, aided by a chorus of ideological enablers across the diaspora, has presided over a campaign in Gaza that increasingly bears the unmistakable hallmarks of genocidal intent.
What might once have been dismissed as fringe vitriol has now become disturbingly mainstream. Calls for the starvation, displacement, and eradication of Palestinians—many of them children—have not come solely from anonymous online trolls or marginal extremists. They have been voiced, repeatedly and without shame, by senior Israeli cabinet members, military spokespeople, elected parliamentarians, state-aligned media figures, and religious authorities. In any functioning liberal democracy, such rhetoric would be disqualifying. In contemporary Israel, it is state-sanctioned doctrine.
We are not witnessing a momentary lapse of judgment in the fog of war. We are witnessing a profound moral collapse—a studied descent into cruelty—carried out with bureaucratic precision and the unapologetic support of some of the wealthiest and most militarily advanced countries in the world.
Even in the darkest chapters of 20th-century history, including Nazi Germany, the architects of mass atrocity attempted to veil their crimes beneath the language of racial science, national purification, or existential necessity. Hitler's Germany went to considerable lengths to obscure the evidence of the Final Solution, destroying documents and dismantling camps in the war’s final months. That very concealment was an admission of guilt—an acknowledgment that some deeds are so grotesque they must be hidden from history.
What we are witnessing in Gaza today is, by contrast, a campaign conducted in full view of the global public, in real time, with near-total impunity. Israeli soldiers film themselves celebrating the bombing of civilian neighbourhoods. Government spokespeople justify the deliberate deprivation of food, water, and medical care. IDF-aligned influencers boast of destroying entire city blocks and turning hospitals into rubble. The dehumanisation of Palestinians is not an unfortunate by-product of war—it is the ideological fuel powering the machinery of destruction.
Aid workers, doctors, teachers, UN staff, journalists—none have been spared. All are dismissed as “human shields” or “terrorist sympathisers” in order to legitimise their targeting. The infrastructure of civil society has been systematically erased. These actions have not only violated every foundational principle of the Geneva Conventions, they have also obliterated the ethical architecture on which post-Holocaust international law was built.
That such crimes are being cheered by Israeli rabbis, echoed by settler movements, and defended in Western capitals by lobbyists and media personalities is a stark testament to the power of ideology to distort moral judgment. How else to explain the spectacle of survivors and descendants of the Shoah calling for—or excusing—the destruction of a besieged, stateless population?
Zionism, conceived in the crucible of 19th-century European nationalism and catastrophically reinforced by the trauma of the Holocaust, has long framed itself as a necessary project of Jewish refuge and renewal. But in its present iteration—militarised, expansionist, and messianic—it has become an ideology of dispossession. Its colonial roots are laid bare in the daily lives of Palestinians: lives defined by occupation, home demolition, arbitrary arrest, statelessness, and now, the wholesale destruction of Gaza.
Like other ethno-nationalist projects—Serbia in the 1990s, Rwanda in 1994—contemporary Zionism relies on a total moral recalibration of its citizenry. It manufactures a worldview in which atrocity becomes necessity, in which the murder of children is justified as pre-emptive self-defence. This moral inversion is not accidental—it is indoctrinated. The media's complicity in suppressing the worst of it has allowed this indoctrination to flourish.
What cannot be suppressed, however, is the growing international awareness that Israel has crossed a line. The numbers are staggering: tens of thousands dead, over 70% women and children, the near-total collapse of Gaza’s health system, the use of starvation as a weapon. The language of genocide is no longer confined to academic circles or human rights NGOs—it is being voiced by former UN officials, legal scholars, and even members of the US and UK foreign policy establishment.
Israel’s supporters argue that such rhetoric is antisemitic. But equating criticism of a state’s policies with hatred of an entire people is not only dishonest—it is dangerous. It erases the growing number of Jewish voices, both in Israel and abroad, who are horrified by what is being done in their name. It also betrays the memory of the Holocaust by weaponising it to justify unconscionable acts.
The broader Israeli public, too, must reckon with this. According to a recent Penn State University survey, more than 80% of Israelis support the forced expulsion of Gaza’s population. Among Israeli men under 40, only 9% oppose all genocide scenarios for Palestinians. These are not the numbers of a healthy democracy. They are the numbers of a society increasingly desensitised to mass atrocity.
International complicity runs deep. Governments in the US, UK, Germany, Australia, and elsewhere have not only provided arms and diplomatic cover—they have vilified dissent, criminalised protest, and protected Israel from accountability at every turn. That some of these same states now scramble to recognise Palestinian statehood speaks more to their desperation to salvage credibility than any genuine moral awakening.
For governments which boast of their friendship with Israel, the mass starvation and forcible displacement of two million people — which cannot be rationalised as part of a conflict with Hamas — may prove to be a bridge too far. Unsurprisingly, their public rhetoric has hardened recently and some will strive to resuscitate the long dead two-state solution by recognising the State of Palestine in June. Washing away their complicity in the mass murder of tens of thousands of innocent civilians, however, will prove much more challenging. Their day of judgment will also come.
But history has a long memory. And this time, the evidence is not hidden in classified archives or remote villages. It is being live-streamed. The world will not forget what it has seen—and those who orchestrated, enabled, or defended this catastrophe will be judged not only by future historians but by courts, communities, and conscience.
The cost of this war will not only be counted in lives lost or cities razed. It will be measured in the collapse of Israel’s moral legitimacy, the erosion of international law, and the deepening of global cynicism about the West’s professed values.
The reckoning will come. It may not be swift. It may not even be public. But when it arrives, it will leave behind a truth that no amount of propaganda can obscure: that in the name of defending itself, Israel may have destroyed the very thing it once claimed to embody.
And those who stood by and cheered—out of fear, ignorance, or blind allegiance—will carry that stain forever.
Comments
Post a Comment