This blog is about how wealthy investors profit from the war machine that they perpetuate, even in "peace" times by stirring up discontent that causes governments to divert their citizens' tax dollars to armament manufacturers, and ultimately their own pockets, The blog starts by examining what Lockheed Martin and BAE Systems are currently doing - via their key investors - to influence that process focusing on Australia's current radical weaponry expansions post the AUKUS agreement with the United States and United Kingdom.
It is intend to update this blog on a frequent basis as developments are occurring almost daily.
Introduction
“Despite the effort
and priority accorded to maintaining a healthy local defence industry, there’s
surprisingly little hard data in the public domain about the size and shape of
the sector.” Australian Strategic Policy Institute, 2017[1]
Extraordinary
amounts of Australian public funds flow into the arms industry. It’s an industry
described as being ‘awash with money’ often under conditions of secrecy
afforded by reference to national security.[2]
“Arms corporations
in Australia do not need to cultivate influence and a positive image with the
public because their main customer is the government. Instead, they make
extensive use of the revolving door, backroom lobbying, manipulation of
research and policymaking, and supplying information to ‘expert’ commentators
who can be relied upon to talk up tensions, arms races and possible war.”[3]
“Media outlets
regularly invite former military and public officials to comment on U.S.
defense policies—without disclosing their financial interests in these
policies”.[4]
“State capture is
the exercise of power by private actors — through control over resources,
threat of violence, or other forms of influence — to shape policies or
implementation in service of their narrow interest” (World Bank 2017).[5]
“The classical
Marxist theory of imperialism explains that due to capitalist competition the
world becomes a battleground where major powers whose giant companies have
outgrown national borders fight for control. As the Marxist theorist Bukharin
put it: ‘The struggle between state capitalist trusts is decided in the first
place by the relation between their military forces, for the military power of
the country is the last resort of the struggling ‘national’ groups of
capitalists.’”[6]
[1] https://www.ourdemocracy.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Case-Study-Arms-Industry-state-capture-report-2022_ADN-combine.pdf
[2] 7 Examples include Australian strategy in an age of
coyness, Rod Lyon, 16 March 2016, https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/australian-strategy-in-an-age-of-coyness/ ; and Australian government rejects Airbus Helicopters
A$3 billion savings offer, Kym Bergmann, 7 October 2020. https://asiapacificdefencereporter.com/government-rejects-airbus-helicopters-a3-billion-savings-offer/
[3] https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5eaac47ff5cd00162f5d23c1/t/621d5cc84fc34437e0d1df91/1646091511949/state+capture+report+2022+-+online.pdf
[4] https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/09/21/its-time-break-up-military-industrial-complex/
Comments
Post a Comment